Voters (1)

Jan 20, 12 01:57 pm
  reply      new comment      top   

Do shells that were not filled with chemicals in Libya trump the WMD NOT found in Iraq? It's all a frame up to feed money to the western military industrial complex

Give a man a fish and he will become a government dependent progressive voter. Teach a man to fish and he become a self sufficient and conservative Angel of Satan. Biden 3:24



Jan 21, 12 12:04 am
  reply      new comment      top   

Libya had undeclared artillery shells that were not filled with chemical weapons, but they also had declared chemical weapons, which is a bit different from the case of Iraq which had the empty shells with nothing to put in them.

Another difference is the couple of million bucks Obama spent helping to overthrow Libya's dictatorship compared to the estimated trillion or so that George W spent on riding Iraq of Saddam and the weapons that he didn't have.

Oh, yeah, and Libya was among the nations that Bush considered allies in the war on terror, along with Pakistan, two countries which actually possessed WMDs.

Ultimate Link Whore


Want to Post Comments?
Register for a free account or log in to an existing account.




Take a Tour

Popular Stories

Today's Top Users
1
34 points
2
5 points
3
2 points
4
1 points
5
0 points

News Tags