She has a bunch of people working for her ... what is misleading is the number of 'staff' working for the other first ladies.
Laura Bush apparently had a lot of staffers too ... at he end of her 8 years .. hte current Queen has apparently taken off where Laura left and then some .. kind of like Obama .. things were bad with GW ... and worse with Obama.
She has a lot of people working for her, which apparently fairly normal.. So, whats the point of this other then to try to bash someone completely out of basis?
I think it is ridiculous that the first lady has so many people working as her staff and their salaries are $1 Million a year.
Of course .. she did sacrifice her time with her trip to Europe and all to help sell the Chicago Olympics, she does deserve some perks.
I agree it is, but why not generalize it to first ladys instead of attempting to say it just her..Which was the point of the whole article.
Kinda makes it a different thing.
BAP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_American_Princess?
hmm..
The Obamas have not cornered the market on being fiscally irresponsible. It's the type of irresponsibility that comes with being in charge of tax money and ALL politicians are guilty.
Kano
Wasnt everyone complaining about no jobs the other day??
Anyway..
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/firstlady.asp
Not completely true as we can see.